Showing posts with label Feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Feminism. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2012

The Feast of Roses



I recently finished Indu Sundaresan’s “The Feast of Roses” and I thought the book made a really good read. It is not a literary masterpiece by any benchmark, but Sundaresan has done extensive research on Jahangir and Nur Jahan and it shows.

I have read the prequel, “The Twentieth Wife” too, but as a history enthusiast, this book held my interest more, for “The Twentieth Wife” is largely the love story of Nur Jahan and Jahangir, whereas this book begins with Jahangir marrying Mehrunnisa as his twentieth wife. Her ascent to power, at a time when women were regarded only as a commodity is extremely entertaining and interesting. She, of course, used Jahangir’s blind love to manipulate him and reach her ends, but we need to look at this through a glass tinted with time. This probably was the only way she could have done it and even that was unheard of, during those times. Women, back then, did not even have a say in whether her husband could marry some X or Y princess, or bring a lady to the harem. And in times like these, Nur Jahan was the last lady to be married by Jahangir, and I think this is a testimony enough for the lady that she was! And in the same breath, I need to take the name of Jahangir, who stood up to show his support for Nur Jahan and even granted her the privilege to mint coins under her name and come to the jharoka to listen to the citizens’ problems and offer advice. No Indian king seems to have accorded such importance to his queens (in the books that I have read, only Kundavai from Ponniyin Selvan comes close to the kind of power wielded by Nur Jahan, but being a Mughal queen must have made the feat much more difficult for her than Kundavai, who was a Hindu princess). And that very act is evidence of Jahangir’s monumental love, much bigger than the Taj Mahal built for her niece (Mumtaz Mahal was Nur Jahan’s niece) by Shah Jahan. As Dumbledore rightly says, “It takes a great deal of bravery to stand up to your enemies, but a great deal more to stand up to your friends”, Jahangir had to face stiff opposition even from the closest of his friends for the freedom and power he had bestowed upon Mehrunnisa. There is not a lot of evidence to show that Mehrunnisa misused this favour and I would like to believe that she put it to use the same way a king would have!

The book takes us through a lot of incidents of historic significance, without giving us the feel of a documentary. The abduction of Jahangir by Mahabat Khan, Shah Jahan’s cold blooded murders of his brothers, Khusrau and Shahryar (the third died on his own before Shah Jahan had a chance to kill him too), the Portuguese burning of the Indian trade ships due to the imperial court’s favour for the English etc. Interestingly, Mughal kings and queens used to own trade ships which used to be a source of their income in addition to the mansabs they enjoyed. And mercifully, ladies too were allowed to own ships and earn money!

Mehrunnisa’s characterization is rock solid with her arrogance and headstrongness never leaving her till her death. Why she wants power is never sufficiently explained, but that is a common human weakness and one does not need a reason to desire power. She doggedly looks after her self interests and the Emperor’s (I suspect that’s because his well being was the only chance of her well being) and Sundaresan has never shown her to be emotional or confused, just because a woman protagonist has to have some moments of weakness. I have come to like Nur Jahan, despite all her shortcomings, mainly because she broke free her shackles, did not allow the society to dictate how she must live, lived with only one purpose: to be the most powerful voice in the Empire and never ever felt guilty about her ambition. I would love to read more about her and I think she was truly a woman who broke the glass ceiling the way we know it today. It is a good thing that the post coincides with Women’s day! I could not have come up with a worthier subject!

Friday, March 9, 2007

Women's day !!!

Hmm..Yesterday was women's day..
What did it mean to me??

Nothing. Perhaps the sad reality that every year we have to raise our voice and make a lot of noise to remind everyone that we still have a long way to go...

Average wage of a female worker in rural areas = 62% of that of a male worker's .
Average wage of a female worker in urban areas = 61% of that of a male worker's.

You don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand why I have given this here.

If I ask you genuinely why is it so, then I am branded a feminist.

I should not ask anyone why I cannot go to Sabarimala.
Or why I should not remain unmarried and study as much as I want to.
Or why my parents alone should spend their life time savings on the mega event of my marriage.
Or why I should take care of my parents in law when my husband would not even raise a finger to look after his.
Or why hostels lock up girls inside because the guys roam about drunk? Why not the vice versa?
Or the simple question of why I should cook and clean while my husband reads newspaper?

Rarely, very rarely you might come across men who do cook and clean. And when you do meet such a man, you have to treat him with extreme reverence.He is God's gift to the earth!!!! After all, who has heard of men who clean the dining table after the meal? They deserve all the praise and even more.

He does these at home; Wow !His wife is the luckiest.
He does not ; That's ok. Its enough if he does not have any bad habit (even tobacco!!)
She does ; Huh ! Whats the big deal? Everyone does.
She does not; She is the talk of the town. Too much freedom given by parents. And did I mention too much education also ?

Well, if you dont hear this dialogues, its not because society has become forward minded. After all, these girls will start talking Feminism and no one has the time or the patience to listen. They all need a break.We have had too much of feminism this century!! Huh!

Amitabh Bachchan (You are right.The same Big B.) was asked in an interview what he thought about his daughter-in-law-to-be Aishwarya Rai. Amitabh promptly replied, "I find her very sweet, simple and domesticated." Yes. You heard it right. Domesticated was the word.

I very much like to give Amitabh the benefit of my doubt that probably he chose a wrong word to convey what he wanted to. But two lines later, there was a question ' How do you think Abiash marriage will increase the brand value of the Bachchans? ' for which he promptly replied, 'I find it very offensive to evaluate a relationship with money.' .Wah Mr.Bachchan! Wah! He did not find it offensive to use the word domesticated but the word brand value offended him..Superb. From A to Z every household wants a 'domesticated' and 'docile' daughter in law.Who will not split the bonds of the family she is entering. Never mind, she was just torn apart from her family to become a part of yours..

I recall a poem I read somewhere :

We use you as a prop, we use you for our play;
We burn you regularly; for dowry they say;
We make you a Goddess; or a cheap lay;
We keep 364; You get one day;
Happy Women's Day ????